The constitutional case that Donald Trump is already banned from being president - Printable Version +- Ipoh Community Forums (https://forums.ipoh.com.my) +-- Forum: News and Current Affairs (https://forums.ipoh.com.my/forum-11.html) +--- Forum: International News (https://forums.ipoh.com.my/forum-13.html) +---- Forum: Politics (https://forums.ipoh.com.my/forum-55.html) +---- Thread: The constitutional case that Donald Trump is already banned from being president (/thread-8349.html)

The constitutional case that Donald Trump is already banned from being president - superadmin - 08-12-2023 Two conservative legal scholars, members of the Federalist Society in good standing, have just published an audacious argument: that Donald Trump is constitutionally prohibited from running for president, and that state election officials have not only the authority but the legal obligation to prevent his name from appearing on the ballot. The legal paper, authored by University of Chicago professor William Baude and University of St. Thomas professor Michael Stokes Paulsen, centers on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment — a provision that limits people from returning to public office if they have since “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” or “given aid or comfort” to those who have. Baude and Paulsen argue that this clearly covers Trump’s behavior between November 2020 and January 2021. “The most politically explosive application of Section Three to the events of January 6, is at the same time the most straightforward,” Baude and Paulsen write. “Former President Donald J. Trump is constitutionally disqualified from again being President (or holding any other covered office) because of his role in the attempted overthrow of the 2020 election and the events leading to the January 6 attack.” The consequences of this argument are astonishing. On Baude and Paulsen’s read, Section 3 is “self-executing” — meaning it does not require an act of Congress to enter force and binds those public officials in the position to act on its dictates. Basically, if a single official anywhere in the US electoral system finds their constitutional analysis compelling, Baude and Paulsen urge them to act on it. -  More -